Comments on: Audio recordings: proposed terms and conditions

By: Stet Lab February 8th 2010: audio recordings – Stet Lab (a space for improvised music in Cork, Ireland)

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:29:34 +0000

[...] are covered under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. [More info…] This entry was written by news, posted on February 15, 2010 at 1:29 pm, filed under audio [...]

By: Stet Lab January 11th 2010: audio recordings – Stet Lab (a space for improvised music in Cork, Ireland)

Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:21:37 +0000

[...] are covered under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. [More info…] This entry was written by news, posted on January 19, 2010 at 12:21 pm, filed under audio [...]

By: Stet Lab December 7th 2009: audio recordings – Stet Lab (a space for improvised music in Cork, Ireland)

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:14:56 +0000

[...] are covered under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. [More info…] This entry was written by news, posted on December 11, 2009 at 12:14 am, filed under audio [...]

By: Stet Lab November 10th 2009: audio recordings – Stet Lab (a space for improvised music in Cork, Ireland)

Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:35:38 +0000

[...] are covered under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. [More info…] This entry was written by news, posted on November 12, 2009 at 12:35 am, filed under audio [...]

By: Stet Lab October 12th 2009: audio recordings – Stet Lab (a space for improvised music in Cork, Ireland)

Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:12:05 +0000

[...] are covered under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. [More info…] This entry was written by news, posted on October 14, 2009 at 6:12 pm, filed under audio [...]

By: Han-earl Park

Han-earl Park — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:25:59 +0000

The December 9th Stet Lab recordings are online. These are the first set of recordings to be released under the CC by-nc-nd license. [More info…]

By: Andrea Bonino

Andrea Bonino — Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:10:55 +0000

I agree with the license chosen, and share the concerns that have been expressed about the tagging. Normally i prefer to use the ShareAlike License for my own work, but I agree that the Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 is more likely to be accepted by all performers involved

By: Tony O Connor

Tony O Connor — Sat, 29 Nov 2008 01:01:52 +0000

Sounds fine to me.

By: Kevin Terry

Kevin Terry — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 22:51:17 +0000

Though I’d prefer the CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License, the Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 is fine with me.

By: Han-earl Park

Han-earl Park — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 12:49:30 +0000

…If one encoded all of the attributees into the meta-data in the mp3 then would merely passing on a non-altered mp3 satisfy the terms of the licence? I agree. If we move onto this license, I will need to re-tag all the mp3s with the performers’ names and an appropriate link to the license. This should be a fairly trivial task, but I really need to know if people have any objections to such a move. Thanks for the comment, Alex. This clarifies many issues in my mind.